Skip to content
LITIGATERLITIGATER

Everything you have to prove.Everything you have to prove it with.All in one place.

That is the whole idea. This page walks you through it slowly, in plain language, assuming you have never heard of us and have every reason to be skeptical. By the end you will know exactly what LITIGATER does, what it refuses to do, and whether it belongs anywhere near your practice.

First, the part you already know.

A deadline lives in three places: your calendar, your paralegal's calendar, and the back of your mind at 2am. Miss it in all three and it is malpractice, not an inconvenience.

A brief goes out citing a case someone pulled six weeks ago. Nobody re-read it. It got reversed in the meantime. Now opposing counsel has read it, and so has the judge.

A witness contradicts, in the fourth deposition, something they swore to in the first affidavit. The contradiction is on page 340. The affidavit is on page 12. The one person who would have caught it is you, and you are tired.

None of that is a technology problem you have been lazy about. It is the structure of litigation: more facts than one mind can hold, spread across more documents than one night can read. LITIGATER is built for exactly that structure, and nothing else.

It is not a chatbot. It is a system.

Most legal AI is a single box you type into and hope. LITIGATER is the opposite: a set of named, purpose-built parts, each doing one job you can name and check, all organized around how a case actually moves from intake to verdict.

The center of it is the Proof Engine. It takes every claim and defense in your case, breaks each one into the legal elements a court actually rules on, and maps every element to the specific facts that carry it, with each fact cited to the exhibit or transcript it came from. What is left on the screen is the only thing that matters: the elements nothing carries yet.

Everything else feeds that picture. Discovery targets the gaps in it. Depositions fill it. The Gate guards what goes out. You will meet each part in turn. For now, hold one sentence: LITIGATER tells you what you can prove, and shows its work.

The whole walkthrough, at a glance.

Ten stops, in the order that makes them easiest to trust, then pricing and a demo. Take them in order, or jump straight to whichever one keeps you up at night.

  1. 01

    Docket & Deadlines

    Every deadline computed from the rule that creates it, not from someone's memory.

    The missed statute of limitations that becomes a malpractice claim.

  2. 02

    Discovery & Drafting

    Requests drafted from the holes in your proof, not from a form file.

    The one request that would have won it, never sent.

  3. 03

    The Gate

    Every citation checked twice before it ever reaches your draft.

    The hallucinated case that gets you sanctioned.

  4. 04

    The Proof Engine

    Every element mapped to the facts that carry it, every gap shown plainly.

    Learning at the pretrial conference that an element was never carried.

  5. 05

    The Sealed Record

    Evidence hashed and sealed on intake, a chain of custody you can hand the court.

    Being accused of altering the file with no way to prove you did not.

  6. 06

    Deposition Suite

    A second chair that checks every answer against the whole record, live.

    The contradiction you only spot weeks after the witness went home.

  7. 07

    Impeachment Ledger

    Every statement cross-checked against every other, across the whole case.

    Your own witness exposed by something you forgot they said.

  8. 08

    Litigation Intelligence

    Judge, opposing counsel, and expert history, organized from the public record.

    Walking in blind to how this judge actually rules.

  9. 09

    Practice Operations

    Intake, billing, and firm operations, run from the same file as the case.

    The business of the firm living in a system that never met the case.

  10. 10

    Platform

    Chronology, damages, trial command, and appeal, all sharing one matter file.

    Ten tools that do not talk to each other.

THE PROOF ENGINE, LIVE

Watch it decide what you can prove.

Here is one negligence claim: four elements a court will rule on, one at a time. Scroll, and watch the record fill them in, one cited fact at a time, until the only thing left glowing is the element you still have to work for.

Mostly submerged, until the one thing that can sink the case breaks the surface. That is where the work goes.

  1. An empty claim.

    Before any facts, the claim is just four elements a court will rule on, one by one. Right now you can prove none of them. That is not pessimism. It is the honest starting point.

  2. Duty, carried.

    The signed engagement and the governing standard of care establish the duty owed. One element leaves the gap column and does not come back.

    Ex. 4: Engagement letter, p.2

  3. Breach, carried.

    The maintenance log and the inspector's report show the duty was breached. Two elements down, cited to the page and line they came from.

    Ex. 11: Inspection report, p.6, line 14

  4. Causation, contested.

    The treating physician ties the injury to the breach. The defense expert disputes it. The element is supported but fought, so it shows contested, not carried. This is where the case actually lives.

    Depo: Dr. Alvarez 88:3, against Dr. Reyes 142:9

  5. Damages, carried.

    The medical bills, the wage records, and the life-care plan carry damages. Three carried, one contested, and nothing on the screen is a guess.

    Ex. 20: Life-care plan, p.1

  6. The only work left is the work that matters.

    Three elements carried, one contested. The screen is not telling you the case is won. It is telling you exactly where to spend the next month: shoring up causation while it is still cheap to fix. That is the whole product, in one strip.

What it will not do

Now the part most software will not tell you.

LITIGATER does not replace your judgment. It shows you what the record supports and where it is thin. Which facts matter, which theory to run, whether a jury will believe any of it: still yours, always yours.

It does not sign your filings. Every draft it produces is a draft. You read it, you check it, you put your bar number on it. The Gate checks citations. It does not practice law.

It does not guarantee outcomes, and it will never tell you a case is safe. No honest tool would. What it gives you is a precise record of what you can prove, so the arguments you make are ones you can stand behind.

Why you can trust what it tells you.

Every fact on the screen is a link, not a claim. Click it and you land on the exhibit page or the transcript line it came from. Nothing is asserted that is not sourced.

Every citation passes the Gate twice before it reaches your draft: once to confirm the authority is still good law, once to confirm it says what you are citing it for. The failure mode behind every sanctions headline, caught at the door.

Every piece of evidence is hashed and sealed the moment it enters, and stored so the original cannot be quietly changed. The chain of custody we market is the same one protecting your file.

The questions you are already asking.

Is this just another AI tool that makes things up?
It is built to do the opposite. Nothing reaches your draft without passing the Gate, which verifies every citation against its source. When LITIGATER is not sure, it shows you the gap instead of filling it with a guess.
What happens to my data?
It is never used to train anyone's model, ours or our providers', and it is written into the contract, not tucked into a privacy policy. Zero data retention means your documents are not stored by the model after the answer is generated. The full architecture is on the Duty of Care page.
Does this replace my associate or my paralegal?
No. It gives one attorney the review capacity of a team, which is a different thing. The judgment, the strategy, and the signature stay with the people who have them.
Is it even ethical to analyze a judge like this?
Litigation Intelligence uses only the public record: dockets, filings, rulings. It describes patterns, it does not predict a person, and it never touches anything behind a login. The full ethics discussion is on the Duty of Care page.
What if the Gate misses something?
The Gate is a floor, not a ceiling. It catches the citation errors that end careers. It does not excuse you from reading the opinion. You are still the lawyer. It just makes sure the easy mistakes never leave the building.

Ready to walk through it?

We start where the stakes are highest and the trust is cheapest to earn: the deadline. It is the single most common way a case becomes a malpractice claim, and it is the easiest thing here to check for yourself.

Start with Docket & Deadlines

Stop 1 of 12. You can leave the walkthrough at any time.