FOR LITIGATION TEAMS
Standardize how your firm proves things.
Ten litigators, ten systems for tracking what's proven. The firm's method lives in senior partners' heads and leaves in their briefcases. And every AI-assisted draft in the building is a supervision question waiting for a name to be attached.
Model Rule 5.3 makes nonlawyer assistance, including AI, the supervising lawyer's responsibility. Personally. "The tool did it" has never once worked as an answer, and it isn't going to start.
LITIGATER is built to be supervised, not just used.
One method, every matter
The Proof Engine becomes the house standard: every case decomposed the same way, every fact placed and cited the same way. A partner can open any matter in the firm and read its verdict strip in thirty seconds.
Supervision as a control, not a memo
Every AI-assisted output is logged: who ran it, what checked it, what shipped. The Gate verifies every citation firm-wide before anything is filed. Your Rule 5.3 file writes itself.
Enterprise controls, one line
SAML SSO, role-based access, IP allow-listing, and a full audit log of every action on every matter. Customer-managed encryption keys on this tier: you hold the key, not us.
Built for your evaluation process
We know a committee is reading this. Security documentation, the DPA, subprocessor list, and an evaluation packet are available on request: everything the vote needs, in one folder.
One waterline for every matter.
Provisioning runs through your identity provider. SAML SSO maps your existing roles into LITIGATER, so access follows the org chart you already have, not a new one someone has to build. Matters migrate in on your schedule, a docket at a time; nothing forces a big-bang cutover.
Every matter gets decomposed by the same element method, so a partner can open any case in the firm and read its verdict strip in thirty seconds. Every AI-assisted draft is logged: who ran it, what checked it, what shipped. That log is the Rule 5.3 file procurement will ask for, produced as a byproduct of using the system, not assembled after the fact for the audit.
Security documentation, the DPA, and the subprocessor list are ready before the committee asks. What stays yours is the supervision itself: the audit trail proves review happened, it does not perform the review. Typical rollout runs weeks, not quarters, administrator setup and role mapping first, matters migrating in behind it. The method only standardizes once your litigators actually use it the same way, and that is a change-management job, not a software feature.